The Basic Principles Of h4831sc load data

The Basic Principles Of h4831sc load data

Blog Article

I gave up on it and went to other powder when the new powder was producing much more strain and was slower when compared to the previous things. I do not bear in mind if I even tried using typical h4831 or not; I'm imagining not.

H4831SC Powder obtainable in inventory now. Ballistically, this Severe Extruded powder is the precise duplicate of H4831. Bodily, it's got a shorter grain sizing, therefore, the designation SC or limited Minimize. The shorter, extra compact kernels allow the powder to flow with the powder steps more smoothly, helping to alleviate the continual reducing of granules.

WARNING: This product or service can expose you to guide, which is thought on the Condition of California to cause cancer and beginning defects or other reproductive harm. For more information visit – .

I have had a few rifles that fouled genuinely poor. Having every one of the copper out was a true PIA right until I found Wipe-Out foaming bore cleaner.

My expertise is that the SC and SSC loaded to the exact same bodyweight since the long Slash reveals a lowered velocity.

I know, rough situations. H4831SC will definitely get the job done, I just didn't like the situation density when loaded long. I do not recall powder charge off the highest of my head but I had been launching a Berger 168gr VLD at 3,000fps that's where I typically intention to generally be. As part of your scenario using what you may have (and what I must have carried out) I'd personally start with the tip on the bearing floor with the bullet proper in the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there h4831sc after you find a velocity node.

i've made use of both and used the exact same charges and have not been in a position to notify any noticable dissimilarities with performance. the SC Variation meters a little smoother is about all. any comments??

Like explained h4831 vs h4831sc earlier mentioned, same things. Everything is different is the dimensions of the kernels. I did hear somewhere that they're going to only make the SC Sooner or later. I have no idea if that is certainly real or not but would seem sensible to me. I use SC for the reason that which is what I located in the 8 lb jug and it works.

WA I might endorse a slower burner which will give far better scenario density like H1000 or IMR 7977, especially if you happen to be loading heavies very long.

locutus stated: I nonetheless have a great stockpile of H450, the ball powder equal of 4831, which flows as a result of my powder measures easily.

I have had related experience with H4350. For me, some ball powders would not shoot nicely with nearly anything except Fed215's. Some elements just Really don't play effectively with other. Seems like you've got selected 3 very good powders, I'd personally expect at the least one of these to shoot.

The "SC" stands for Shorter Slice. I have not observed a distinction between both powder dut I do h4831sc load data not Assume I'd blend them.

Am i able to assume that H4831 could be substituted for H4831sc ? I'm sure the physical big difference but will it have an affect on the burn or velocity? I believe not but I'm not one hundred% guaranteed.

The truth that the H4831 is in fact a slower burning powder is precisely why you are looking at greater velocities received with that powder, versus Whatever you've viewed Using the IMR stuff.